Hi, I am giving a

Community 1585 0
Hi, I am giving a piano recital of romantic repetoire at a small theatre near me and I was wondering if you would be able to give me some feedback on my selected programme. Beethoveen: Pathetique Sonata Chopin: Mazurka op. 17 no. 4 Nocturne op. 48 no. 1 Scherzo no. 2 -INTERVAL- Chopin: Ballade no. 3 Rachmaninoff: Elegie op.3 no. 1 Prelude op. 32 no 10 Scriabin: Nocturne for the left hand Op. 9 no, 2 Prelude Op. 48 no. 2 Etude Op. 2, no. 1 Etude Op. 8, no 12 Encores (In needed) Debussy: The girl with the flaxen hair. Chopin Etude op. 10, no 12 (Revolutionary) Do you think that it is too long? Any constructive ideas would be most helpful.
Last edited in 2017-05-01 08:06


(Total 2
我 Me
  • PlayerGT

    Hi Alistaire, I love to give recitals now and then...Mostly for aged people in Houses where they are really fond of good classical music. So I have some experience in dealing with programs and selecting pieces, styles and composers. Generally speaking I acclaim the selection of composers as Beethoven Chopin and Scriabine. However, as my predecessor already remarked, the program is too long. Moreover I think playing Chopin immediately after Beethoven before the interval is not a wise choice. You`d better save Chopin for after the interval. What about beginning with a prelude and fugue by Bach(or two); or combining the Beethoven with that marvelous Mozart rondo in a minor? Or Mozart`s well-known fantasy in c minor?(don`t remember the KV`s). Or...a Haydn fantasy in c major.. A few Scarlatti sonatas(which, as you probably are aware of, ate very short but delightfully spiritual and vivid, ironic and charming). So I would suggest a mixture of Baroque and Classicism/Early Rom. for the first part of your program; then one nocture or mazurka by Chopin, followed by either the 3d ballad or the 2d scherzo. That would take appr. 15 minutes; then the Rachmaninoff(10 minutes); finally a few Scriabine pieces, but not exceeding 45` for the 2d part of your recital. It might be smart to play only 2 or 3 Scriabine short pieces and conclude with something substantial. Or placing Scriabine after Chopin(combining e.g. an early prelude with a later etude). Personally I would choose a sonata by Scriabine(but a rather short one). NUmber 4? Or 5? An alternative: playing Chopin, a few Scriabine pieces, and ending on the op. 32 no. 10 prelude plus the no. 12(id) for more speed and drama; and finally the very lyrical and not too difficult op. 23 no. 4(d major); or even better, first 23/4, then 32/12 and finally 32/10(for its mighty climax and narrating and dramatic aspects). If you want to stick to the elegy, then i would start with it; then the 32/12; and 32/10 for impact! These are only suggestions! Feel free to mix and experiment! But do not exceed the 2 times 45`!

    1st May, 2017

  • CarolBlackburn

    First of all, congratulation for your exquisite taste and gifts. I`m a piano student planning to play a day not too far almost all the beautiful pieces you mention. Assuming that I could assist, I`m sure that I wouldn`t get tired at all, on the contrary, I`d enjoy your a programme a lot. But I`m not sure of your audience. I remember the story about the Beethoven`s concert having the premieres of the 5th and 6th symphonies and several other works, and after several hours of music, someone commented: "One can get tired of the good music". I think it would be better if you manage that each part don`t reach 45 minutes. No matter how beautiful the music, it`s not easy to stay sitting and attentive more than that.

    1st May, 2017

His post